0

How do you tag the individual houses that people lodge at within a chalet area? You can't tag them as tourism=chalet in addition to building=house/yes, can you? I mean, if the whole area is already tagged as tourism=chalet, tagging the houses as that seems a bit weird.

asked 21 May, 09:27

AdventrrGrrl's gravatar image

AdventrrGrrl
46116
accept rate: 0%


One Answer:
1

The building tag clearly needs to be tagged to a building. It should either be building=yes or reflect what the building was built do be, what it looks like. It could be something like building=house, building=cabin or building=bungalow. And you are right the tourism tag should then either be tagged on an individual building or an individual building including its grounds or to the perimeter of a group of buildings if they belong to each other in some kind, not on all of those options.

If the individual buildings have some kind of reference add a name or ref tag to them.

permanent link

answered 21 May, 11:38

TZorn's gravatar image

TZorn
5.6k227111
accept rate: 14%

So if the "houses" were built specifically for lodging, but they look like big rustic cabins, shall I tag them as building=cabin? And since there's already a tourism=chalet area around them, I don't need to add a tourism tag to the individual "cabins", do I?

(22 May, 07:25) AdventrrGrrl
1

Yes, I would tag them as building=cabin and no, you don't put the tourism=chalet on the buildings.

(22 May, 08:01) TZorn

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×853
×24
×4
×1
×1

question asked: 21 May, 09:27

question was seen: 111 times

last updated: 22 May, 08:01

powered by OSQA